๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 942+ reviews
Toys โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

MTG Deck Sleeves Lot

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5(942 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
โœ“ on the house delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Lot of miscellaneous sleeves for Magic the Gathering cards

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
rapid dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
accessible Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

MTG Deck Sleeves Lot

Lot of miscellaneous sleeves for Magic the Gathering cards​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 188752

Category: Toys > Trading Cards > Trading Card Decks

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9793 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Super happy
The MTG Deck Sleeves Lot arrived and worked without any issues.
25 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
splendid MTG Deck Sleeves Lot!
Personally, it does the job and it meets expectations.
47 people found this helpful
TM​
Tyler Mitchell โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Memphis, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
solely what I wanted
From my experience, the MTG Deck Sleeves Lot works fine which is good enough.
19 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
No complaints
After a few days, the MTG Deck Sleeves Lot feels solid so Iโ€™m okay with it.
7 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago ยท Cleveland, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
truly pleased
After several use, the MTG Deck Sleeves Lot is practical which is good enough.
5 people found this helpful