🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 782+ reviews
Pet βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

SmartyKat Triple Tunnel

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5(782 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$5.1
$8.5
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Triple play tunnel for cats fabulous condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

SmartyKat Triple Tunnel

Triple play tunnel for cats
superb condition​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Pet products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 624099

Category: Pet > Cat Supplies > Cat Toys

Original Price:$8.5 USD

Sale Price: $5.1 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2736 reviews
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
delightful SmartyKat Triple Tunnel!
To be fair, the SmartyKat Triple Tunnel works fine and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
40 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent value for money
Quality is decent for the price. SmartyKat Triple Tunnel is fine.
26 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly satisfied
In daily use, the SmartyKat Triple Tunnel fits my needs and I’m satisfied.
31 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really terrific
The SmartyKat Triple Tunnel seems consistent in performance.
22 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb SmartyKat Triple Tunnel!
The SmartyKat Triple Tunnel was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.
32 people found this helpful