🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 296+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage garnet earrings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5(296 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$47
$78.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

old but keep on fabulous quality vintage garnet

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage garnet earrings

old but keep on superb quality
vintage garnet

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 702047

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Earrings

Original Price:$78.33 USD

Sale Price: $47 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6435 reviews

SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
the Vintage garnet earrings does its job so no complaints. Nothing fancy.
15 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Chicago, IL 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
premier Vintage garnet earrings ever
To be fair, the Vintage garnet earrings fits my needs which feels reasonable. Arrived on time.
32 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
To be fair, the Vintage garnet earrings is hassle-at no charge to use and I don’t regret it.​
28 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptional purchase
Using the Vintage garnet earrings has been accessible.
7 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
A+ quality
The Vintage garnet earrings works well for daily use.
36 people found this helpful