🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 981+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Brooch Pin

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5(981 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$2.37
$3.95
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This is a vintage silver flower brooch pin.oys in outstanding condition.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Brooch Pin

This is a vintage silver flower brooch pin.oys in superb condition.​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1038887

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Brooches

Original Price:$3.95 USD

Sale Price: $2.37 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2759 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific quality
The Vintage Brooch Pin arrived sooner than expected.
30 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really magnificent
Honestly, the Vintage Brooch Pin works as described and it meets expectations.
27 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez
3 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely adore it
After a few days, the Vintage Brooch Pin works as described which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
7 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
No complaints
At first, the Vintage Brooch Pin is practical and it’s fine overall. Packaging was uncomplicated.
5 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb Vintage Brooch Pin!
After certain use, the Vintage Brooch Pin still works fine.
4 people found this helpful