🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 372+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5(372 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6.5
$10.83
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan. Offers accepted

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid dispatch
↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan.
Offers accepted

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1401379

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Other

Original Price:$10.83 USD

Sale Price: $6.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8720 reviews
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy​
Performance of the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan has been stable.
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
In daily use, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan works fine so it’s acceptable.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
13 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So glad I bought this
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan is uncomplicated to use so I’m okay with it.
10 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
The Vintage magazine rack and dust pan arrived exactly as described.
16 people found this helpful