🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 832+ reviews
Office βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Blank invitations

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5(832 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11​
$18.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

I have 125 inner sleeves and 65 outer envelopes outstanding to insert your own wedding invitation in!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Blank invitations

I have 125 inner sleeves and 65 outer envelopes
impeccable to insert your own wedding invitation in!

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Office products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2404882

Category: Office > Paper > Cardstock

Original Price:$18.33 USD

Sale Price: $11 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7346 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
Not bad. The Blank invitations does the job without issues.
27 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green
4 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
In daily use, the Blank invitations performs as expected so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.
21 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
Honestly, the Blank invitations performs as expected and it works for me.
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate purchase ever
For the price, the Blank invitations fits my needs so no complaints. No setup issues.
24 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really happy
From my experience, the Blank invitations performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Works fine so far.
17 people found this helpful